Agency News

India News | Sonia Gandhi Electoral Roll Name Inclusion Matter: Court Defers Hearing of Complaint Amid Lawyers’ Strike

Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The magistrate court at Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday deferred the hearing of a complaint concerning the inclusion of Sonia Gandhi’s name in the electoral roll in 1980, before she became an Indian citizen in April 1983. The matter could not be heard due to a lawyers’ strike.

India News | Sonia Gandhi Electoral Roll Name Inclusion Matter: Court Defers Hearing of Complaint Amid Lawyers’ Strike
Congress leader Sonia Gandhi (File photo/ANI)

New Delhi [India], October 28 (ANI): The magistrate court at Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday deferred the hearing of a complaint concerning the inclusion of Sonia Gandhi’s name in the electoral roll in 1980, before she became an Indian citizen in April 1983. The matter could not be heard due to a lawyers’ strike.

The matter was remanded to the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) by the Sessions Court after it set aside the earlier order in which the ACJM had refused to direct the registration of an FIR against Sonia Gandhi.

Also Read | Ladakh Admin Rebuts Sonam Wangchuk's Claims on UT Excise Policy.

ACJM (MP-MLA cases) Vinod Joshi deferred the matter to November 6.

On September 21, the Special Judge (MP-MLA cases) allowed the revision against the magistrate court’s order. The Sessions Court had set aside the order passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in 2025. The order had been challenged by the complainant, advocate Vikas Tripathi.

Also Read | Nagaland Dear Lottery Sambad Result Today 1 PM Live: Dear Spark Wednesday Lottery Result of October 28, 2026 Declared Online, Watch Lucky Draw Winners List.

While allowing the petition, Special Judge Vishal Gogne observed that the complaint had been rejected on the ground that a photocopy of an unverified record had been submitted, and held that the order was liable to be set aside.

“The order is a non-speaking order. It is liable to be set aside,” the Special Judge had said on September 21.

The Sessions Court had said that it found the observation as perverse in relation to the jurisdiction on the issues of citizenship.

It further noted that the order (under challenge) was a non-speaking order on the disclosure of whether a cognizable offence was committed or not.

"Observation regarding the central government and election commission in relation to citizenship are improper," the court had said adding that it is Ineffective order on the disclosure of cognizance offence.

The court also observed that as per the allegations, the name of Sonia Gandhi was included in the voter list in 1980. It was struck in 1982, and thereafter her name was added in 1983. The court had said that the voter list is meant for the citizens only.

The court also noted that, as per the documents filed by the complainant, the name of Sonia Gandhi was in the voter list and her residential address was at Safdarjung Road, New Delhi. 

The Sessions Court also observed that the order under challenge did not record the reasons for rejecting the complaint and was, therefore, liable to be set aside. It held that the matter needed to be remanded back.

The revisional court had said that it cannot assume the role of the magistrate court. The matter is remanded back and to be decided afresh. The court shall call for a status report from the concerned police officer and shall pass a speaking order after hearing the concerned police officer.

Revisionist Vikas Tripathi had alleged that her name was included in the voter list prior to her becoming a citizen of India. (ANI)

(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)