Cricket

Chris Green, Jason Holder Criticise Umpiring After Johnson Charles No-Ball Incident in CPL 2026

Umpiring chaos erupted in the Caribbean Premier League today at Warner Park as TV umpire Carl Tuckett controversially recalled St Kitts & Nevis Patriots batsman Johnson Charles after he was dismissed off a high full-toss and had already left the field.

Chris Green, Jason Holder Criticise Umpiring After Johnson Charles No-Ball Incident in CPL 2026
Jason Holder (Photo credit: X @sknpatriots)

The Caribbean Premier League (CPL) was plunged into umpiring controversy today at Warner Park as St Kitts & Nevis Patriots batsman Johnson Charles was sensationally recalled after being given out, a decision that visibly infuriated Barbados Tridents captain Chris Green and left the cricket world questioning the application of the Laws of Cricket. Trinbago Knight Riders Retire Franchise Legend Dwayne Bravo's Iconic No 47 Jersey in Historic CPL Tribute.

Johnson Charles Smashes First Half-Century of CPL 2026 Season

The incident, which occurred during the CPL clash on September 2, 2026, saw TV Umpire Carl Tuckett overturn an on-field decision by umpires Chris Wright and Zahid Bassarath, who had failed to call a high full-toss from Tridents bowler Ramon Simmonds as a no-ball. Charles, caught in the outfield, had already begun his long walk back to the pavilion and had left the field before the reversal.

The Controversial Reversal

The drama unfolded when Charles, then on 26 runs from 15 deliveries, lofted a high full-toss from Simmonds towards deep midwicket. Fielder Sherfane Rutherford completed the catch, and Charles was given out, trudging off the pitch. However, the Patriots' bench and the home crowd voiced strong displeasure, leading to a referral to the third umpire.

Carl Tuckett, the TV umpire, subsequently signalled a no-ball, reversing the initial decision. Crucially, by this time, Charles had already exited the field. Under the Laws of Cricket, a batsman cannot be recalled to the crease once they have left the field of play following a dismissal if the appeal has been made and the decision given, especially if the timing for an appeal withdrawal (Law 31.8) has passed. Despite this, Charles was controversially brought back.

Barbados Tridents captain Chris Green was "understandably furious" with the decision, as was fielder Sherfane Rutherford. The controversial recall proved incredibly costly for the Tridents. The ensuing free hit was smashed for six by Charles, who went on to score a match-winning 78 runs from just 45 balls. Quinton de Kock Joins Virat Kohli and David Warner In Elite Club After Scoring 10th T20 Century.

Match Outcome and Aftermath

Charles's innings was instrumental in the St Kitts & Nevis Patriots successfully chasing down a formidable target of 217 with five balls to spare, securing a six-wicket victory. This dramatic win, a significant run chase in CPL history, was a much-needed boost for the Patriots, who along with the Tridents, had been languishing at the bottom of the tournament table. Other key contributions to the chase came from Dasun Shanaka, Jason Holder, Andre Fletcher, and Wanindu Hasaranga for the Patriots.

Speaking after the match, Charles acknowledged the drama, stating, “Some controversies just liven up the game, and it’s all up to the umpires.” However, the sentiment from the Tridents camp was one of frustration, highlighting a moment that many believe transcended the established rules of the game. The incident will undoubtedly ignite further discussions about umpire review protocols and the interpretation of cricket's regulations, particularly concerning player recalls.

(The above story first appeared on LatestLY on Sep 02, 2026 04:48 PM IST. For more news and updates on politics, world, sports, entertainment and lifestyle, log on to our website latestly.com).