India News | “POCSO Offence Cannot Be Quashed on Basis of Compromise”, Says Delhi High Court
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under the POCSO Act cannot be quashed based on a compromise between a child victim or the victim's family and the accused, and dismissed a plea seeking quashing of an FIR and related proceedings.
New Delhi [India], September 24 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has held that proceedings relating to offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act cannot be quashed based on a compromise between the child victim or the victim’s family and the accused.
Justice Sachin Datta observed while dismissing a petition seeking the quashing of an FIR and the proceedings arising from it based on a settlement stated to have been reached with the victim with the intervention of her family.
Also Read | Opposition To Move Fresh Removal Motion Against CEC Gyanesh Kumar in Parliament Amid SIR Row.
The court noted that the case involved allegations of aggravated penetrative sexual assault upon a child by a person allegedly in a position of trust or authority. It observed that such offences are heinous and have a serious impact on society.
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s judgment, which held that although the High Court has inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings in appropriate cases where parties have settled their dispute, such power has to be exercised having regard to the nature and gravity of the offence.
The Supreme Court had specifically held that heinous and serious offences, including rape, cannot ordinarily be quashed merely because the victim or the victim’s family and the accused have settled the dispute, as such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society.
Applying the principle, the Delhi High Court held that the child victim or the victim’s family cannot compromise an offence under the POCSO Act. It said that quashing the proceedings at this stage based on a compromise would defeat the object of the statute as well as the ends of justice.
The court accordingly dismissed the petition. At the same time, the court clarified that its order should not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case, which would be decided by the trial court on the basis of evidence. (ANI)
(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)