India News | Andhra HC Reserves Order on Bail Pleas in Tirupati Temple Ghee Adulteration Case
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has reserved its verdict on the bail applications of Pomil Jain and Vipin Jain, who are currently in judicial custody in connection with the alleged supply of adulterated cow ghee to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) by AR Dairy. Senior Counsel S. Sriram and Advocate Sushil Kumar represented the accused.
Amaravati (Andhra Pradesh) [India], June 27 (ANI): The Andhra Pradesh High Court has reserved its verdict on the bail applications of Pomil Jain and Vipin Jain, who are currently in judicial custody in connection with the alleged supply of adulterated cow ghee to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) by AR Dairy. Senior Counsel S. Sriram and Advocate Sushil Kumar represented the accused.
The case originated from an FIR lodged by the General Manager of TTD, accusing the supplier of violating tender terms and delivering substandard ghee intended for use in sacred rituals at the Tirumala temple.
Given the potential implications for public health and religious sanctity, the Supreme Court had intervened and directed the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to conduct a fair and independent probe.
In compliance with the Court's directions, the accused appeared before the SIT in February 2025 and have been in custody since. Investigations suggest the adulterated ghee was sourced from Bhole Baba Dairy, routed through Vyshnavi Dairy, and ultimately supplied to TTD by AR Dairy.
The probe is being led by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as part of a coordinated multi-agency effort.
Arguing for the petitioners, Senior Counsel S. Sriram and Advocate Sushil Kumar highlighted the prolonged incarceration of the accused and pointed to procedural lapses in the investigation. They questioned the timing of FIRs related to witness intimidation--raised by the SIT and CBI in March and April, but filed only in June--suggesting the delay reflected an afterthought.
The SIT submitted material allegedly showing that the accused attempted to threaten witnesses. However, the defence drew the Court's attention to the actions of a police officer who continued to investigate the case despite not being part of the Supreme Court-appointed SIT--an irregularity already criticized by another bench of the High Court.
The CBI, represented by Standing Counsel PSP Suresh Kumar, defended the investigative process, maintaining that all steps were taken lawfully and with proper magisterial oversight.
Emphasizing full cooperation with the investigation, the defence reiterated that the petitioners posed no flight risk and were willing to adhere to any conditions imposed by the Court, including restrictions on travel, regular reporting, and non-interference with witnesses.
After hearing detailed submissions from both sides, Justice Srinivas Reddy reserved the order on the bail pleas. (ANI)
(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)