India News | “Cannot Be Termed Relief”: Advocate Sankar on SC's Week-long Stay on CMRL Probe Against Former Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the investigation for a week into the FIR against former Keralam Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, his daughter Veena Thaikkandiyil and son-in-law Mohammed Riyas in the CMRL case, allowing them to approach the Kerala High Court's division bench. Advocate M S Vishnu Sankar clarified that the interim order cannot be termed a relief, while CPI(M) leader M V Govindan welcomed the verdict.
New Delhi [India], October 21 (ANI): The decision of the Supreme Court (SC) to put a week's stay on the Enforcement Directorate (ED)'s investigation against former Keralam Chief Minister (CM) Pinarayi Vijayan is only an interim window to approach the Kerala High Court's division bench and cannot be termed relief, Advocate M S Vishnu Sankar clarified on Wednesday.
Speaking on the Supreme Court's decision, Sankar said the court was hearing Vijayan's plea that he had not been heard by the High Court before it ordered the registration of an FIR in the case.
Also Read | GRAP-1 Curbs Imposed in Delhi-NCR As AQI Slips to 'Poor' Category.
"Today, the court was hearing former CM Pinarayi Vijayan's case regarding his plea that he was not heard by the High Court while deciding the FIR registration. The matter has been remanded to the Division Bench, giving him seven days to present his case. No further investigation will take place during these seven days. However, the FIR and ECIR registered by the ED and the police have not been stayed by the court," he told ANI.
He further clarified that the order provided an interim period for the petitioners to approach the High Court for relief and should not be interpreted as a final decision in their favour.
Also Read | Gujarat Accident: 3 Killed, 1 Injured as Motorcycle Plunges 50 Feet From Bridge in Surat.
Meanwhile, CPI(M) State Secretary M V Govindan welcomed the Supreme Court's intervention, describing it as a verdict that upheld the rule of law. He reiterated the party's position that the case was politically motivated and questioned why the Kerala government had not appealed against the High Court's order directing the registration of an FIR.
"This is a Supreme Court verdict that upholds the rule of law. This was a fabricated case, and I had said earlier that it was politically motivated. The court has delivered a very encouraging verdict. The government should have appealed. Why did it not appeal? On what basis did it proceed with the FIR so quickly?" Govindan said.
He added that the CPI(M) would continue to challenge what it described as a politically motivated move through both legal and political means. Govindan also said that Pinarayi Vijayan no longer needed to appear before the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the investigation for a week into the FIR against Vijayan, his daughter Veena Thaikkandiyil and son-in-law Mohammed Riyas in the CMRL-Exalogic corruption case, allowing them to approach the Kerala High Court's division bench against an order directing registration of the FIR. (ANI)
(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)