‘You Are Not Gen Z’: Delhi HC’s Light-Hearted Exchange With Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka During Plea Hearing

The Delhi High Court had a light-hearted exchange during the hearing of a plea by Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, when the court asked about their ages and remarked that they were not part of Generation Z.

CJP leaders Abhijit Dipke, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka (Photo Credits: X/@LiveLawIndia)

New Delhi, October 21: The Delhi High Court had a light-hearted exchange during the hearing of a plea by Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, when the court asked about their ages and remarked that they were not part of Generation Z. During the hearing, Justice Subramonium Prasad asked advocate Abhik Chimni, appearing for the petitioners, about their ages. Chimni told the court that Saurav Das was 27 and Ashutosh Ranka was 32.

“Then you are not Gen Z. What is Gen Z?” the court asked. After being informed that people born after 1997 are considered Gen Z, the court reiterated, “Then you are not Gen Z.” The exchange took place while the court was hearing the petitioners’ challenge to a Special Executive Magistrate’s order extending their judicial custody till October 21. “Police Should Focus on Actual Criminals”: CJP Activist Abhijeet Dipke Slams Police and Govt over Priorities After Firing at Tiger Shroff’s Car.

Justice Subramonium Prasad also questioned the petitioners’ decision to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution when an alternative remedy of revision could be available against the impugned order. Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, along with advocate Ashish Dixit, appeared for the Delhi Police, while Chimni represented Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka and the other petitioners. ‘We Must Not Become What We Hate’: CJP's Abhijeet Dipke Urges Calm Amid Detention of Sourav Das, Ashutosh Ranka.

The petitioners subsequently withdrew their plea. The High Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Rating:4

TruLY Score 4 – Reliable | On a Trust Scale of 0-5 this article has scored 4 on LatestLY. The information comes from reputable news agencies like (ANI ). While not an official source, it meets professional journalism standards and can be confidently shared with your friends and family, though some updates may follow.

Share Now

Share Now