New Delhi, Jul 29 (PTI) The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to entertain a PIL seeking inclusion of lawyers in the definition of professionals so that they can access the various schemes under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Development Act, 2006.

A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan said that PILs are filed for the poor, downtrodden, illiterate or those for whom accessing courts is difficult and lawyers do not come under that category.

Also Read | Assam Forest Officials Seize Illegal Consignment of Exotic Animals in Silchar, Rescue Kangaroo, 6 Macaw Parrots, 3 Tortoises.

"You (petitioner) are misunderstanding the concept of PILs. We are not inclined to entertain it. We are dismissing it," the bench said.

It said that as and when a lawyer moves the court with such a prayer, it will look into it and dismissed the petition by Abhijit Mishra, a financial economist, who contended that MSME Ministry does not consider advocates as eligible professionals for the various schemes under the Act.

Also Read | Mumbai's Coronavirus Case Tally Rises to 1,11,964: Live News Breaking And Coronavirus Updates on July 29, 2020.

Mishra, in the petition filed through advocate Payal Bahl, had said that under the MSME Act the eligibility criteria of having a Goods and Service Tax Identification Number (GSTIN), business PAN or Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TAN) as mandatory requirement to access the development schemes is against the welfare of the advocates.

Bahl, after the hearing, told PTI that the high court''s order would be challenged in the Supreme Court.

The petition claimed that by virtue of the services provided by lawyers to their clients, they can be considered under the definition of enterprise as given in the MSME Act.

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)