India News | Mathura Court to Hear on Nov 4 Bail Plea of 2 Held on Way to Hathras
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. A district court here has deferred till November 4 the hearing on the bail plea of the two of the four people booked for sedition and other charges after their arrest on their way to the Hathras rape-murder victim's village earlier this month.
Mathura, Oct 29 (PTI) A district court here has deferred till November 4 the hearing on the bail plea of the two of the four people booked for sedition and other charges after their arrest on their way to the Hathras rape-murder victim's village earlier this month.
Those arrested included a Kerala journalist, Siddique Kappan, who has not filed any bail application so far.
Also Read | Behind-The-Scenes With Model & Influencer Emily Knight.
The other accused in the case are Aalam, Masood and Atiqur Rahman.
According to the FIR, charges under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the IT Act were also filed against the four, who were accused by the state police of having links with the alleged radical group Popular Front of India.
Also Read | Violet Summers' Love Affair With Sneakers.
Earlier, their bail plea was rejected by the chief judicial magistrate, Mathura, on October 16.
According to Assistant District Government Council Narendra Sharma, the bail application of Aalam and Masood was taken up by Additional District Judge Amar Singh on Thursday. Nobody presented the request for the bail of Atiqur Rahman.
Sharma said DSP (STF) Rakesh Paliwal had requested the court to give more time for investigation since the offense is of serious nature and information has to be collected from different places.
Rejecting his request, the judge said no further adjournment will be allowed and asked to collect information within the stipulated period only, Sharma said.
Meanwhile, a memo on behalf of Atiqur Rahman, Aalam and Masood was presented in the court of the chief judicial magistrate, Assistant Prosecuting Officer Brijmohan Singh said.
Since the time limit for police custody is only 15 days, STF cannot interrogate them as the period has expired, the memo stated.
Meanwhile, the Aalam's wife alleged that her husband, a driver by profession, has been falsely implicated in the case.
She rejected the charge that objectionable material was recovered from her husband.
The Aalam's wife alleged that she is not being allowed to meet her husband by the Mathura jail authorities.
(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)