India News | Contempt: Justice Lalit Offers to Recuse from Hearing Bhushan's Plea Seeking Right to Appeal

New Delhi, May 6 (PTI) Supreme Court judge Justice U U Lalit Friday offered to recuse from hearing a plea filed by activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan seeking the right of appeal against convictions in original criminal contempt cases to be heard by a larger and a different bench.

Justice Lalit, who was heading a three-judge bench also comprising Justices S Ravindra Bhat and P S Narasimha, told the counsel for the parties that he was appointed as amicus curiae in one of the matters relating to Bhushan.

Also Read | Moto Edge 30 India Launch Confirmed for May 12, 2022.

"I think it was Harish Salve (senior advocate) as amicus curiae in the Tehelka matter. I was also the amicus in the same matter for almost 16 years...

“I was involved in the matter so, therefore, should I go ahead with the matter or should I not go ahead with the matter," Justice Lalit asked.

Also Read | Tajinder Bagga Arrest: From The BJP Leader’s Arrest by Punjab Police to His Return to Delhi, Here’s All That Happened During the Day.

Justice Lalit asked the counsel appearing for Bhushan to file an affidavit stating that he has no objection if he hears the case.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan told the bench to go ahead with the matter.

"Just file the affidavit and it would become part of the record," Justice Lalit said when Dhavan urged the court to record his submissions.

The apex court adjourned the matter for hearing on May 17, 2022.

Bhushan, convicted and awarded one rupee fine for his contemptuous tweets against the judiciary in August 2020, had moved the top court seeking the right of appeal against convictions in original criminal contempt cases to be heard by a larger and a different bench.

The plea sought a declaration that a "person convicted for criminal contempt by this court, including the petitioner herein, would have a right to an intra-court appeal to be heard by a larger and different bench".

Bhushan, in the plea, suggested procedural changes to reduce the chances of "arbitrary, vengeful and high-handed decisions" in criminal contempt cases saying that in such cases the top court is the aggrieved party, the "prosecutor, the witness, and the judge" and hence they raise fear of inherent bias.PTI PKS

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)