India News | SC Collegium Declines to Recommend Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala for Permanent Judge over 'skin-to-skin' Verdict
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Supreme Court Collegium is learnt to have decided not to recommend the name of Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala, the woman additional judge of the Bombay High Court, as a permanent judge after she gave some controversial judgments including the "skin-to-skin" contact verdict in a POCSO case.
New Delhi [India], December 17 (ANI): The Supreme Court Collegium is learnt to have decided not to recommend the name of Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala, the woman additional judge of the Bombay High Court, as a permanent judge after she gave some controversial judgments including the "skin-to-skin" contact verdict in a POCSO case.
The Collegium's decision means Justice Ganediwala, serving at Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court, would be demoted back to district judiciary at the end of her additional judgeship in February 2022.
The three-member Collegium for deciding appointments in High Courts comprises Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, and Justices UU Lalit and AM Khanwilkar.
Last year, the Centre had disagreed with Collegium's decision to give her a two-year extension as an additional judge and granted only a one-year extension on the ground of her insensitivity towards children facing sexual abuse.
Also Read | Doctors Remove 156 Stones from 50-Year-Old Man’s Kidney in Hyderabad.
On November 18, the top court had set aside Justice Ganediwala's two judgments passed in January 2020, interpreting sexual assault provisions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The judge had faced widespread criticism after she acquitted a man accused of groping a minor, on the ground that pressing the breasts of a minor girl without removing her top didn't entail skin-to-skin contact, hence not a POCSO Act offence. The judgement was passed on January 19, 2020.
In another verdict passed on January 28, 2020, she acquitted a 50-year-old man by ruling that holding the hand of a five-year-old kid and unzipping pants in front of her could not be categorised as a sexual offence under POCSO Act.
The top court had overturned both her judgments.
However, by its December 14 resolution, the collegium has approved the proposal for the appointment of three other additional judges of the Bombay High Court as permanent judges of that court. (ANI)
(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)