India News | Andhra HC Reserves Order on Chandrababu Naidu's Bail Plea in Inner Ring Road Scam Case

Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Tuesday reserved its judgment on TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu's bail plea in the Amaravati Inner Ring Road scam case.

India | Representational Image

Amaravati, Oct 3 (PTI) The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Tuesday reserved its judgment on TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu's bail plea in the Amaravati Inner Ring Road scam case.

The Inner Ring Road scam case pertains to manipulating the master plan of Amaravati capital city, alignment of Inner Ring Road and the seed capital to allegedly offer undue enrichment to several companies during Naidu's tenure as chief minister.

Also Read | Malegaon 2008 Blasts Case: BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur Breaks Down While Recording Her Statement Before Special NIA Court.

During the court proceedings, the CID informed that Naidu has not been arrested in the IRR scam case and it has filed applications in the special court asking the former CM to be produced before it to formally arrest and take him into police custody.

Also Read | Durga Puja 2023 Art in Kolkata: Netherlands, India Artists Collaborate To Give Shape to Behala Nutan Dal’s Theme.

Naidu, virtually represented by Siddarth Luthra, filed an application that if an FIR has been registered against an accused person in the same police station and arrested in that case then it shall be deemed that he has been arrested in all his pending cases in that particular police station.

However, the CID denied that the deemed custody concept is not applicable in this case. Further, the CID noted that deemed custody is not applicable as it has already filed police custody and prisoner on transit warrant applications against Naidu in the FiberGrid and IRR cases in the Vijayawada ACB Court.

The CID observed that the deemed custody is not applicable when these petitions are pending before the court and hence bail for Naidu is not maintainable.

In light of this argument, Naidu's lawyer appealed to the court to treat his bail application as anticipatory bail. The CID contended that there would either be bail or anticipatory bail but not both.

It also highlighted that anticipatory bail cannot be taken up when police custody petitions are pending.

Meanwhile, the CID has exempted Naidu's son and TDP general secretary Nara Lokesh from bringing Heritage Foods Ltd's bank account details as part of the notice it has served to him for questioning in the IRR case.

The CID has also agreed to give more time for Lokesh to appear for questioning. Lokesh is now expected to appear a week later on October 10, accompanied by lawyers whose presence will be at an inaudible distance during questioning.

Moreover, Lokesh's anticipatory bail plea in the FiberGrid case was debunked by the CID that he is not even an accused person yet in that case, assuring that it will follow the procedure of serving him a notice under CrPC Section 41 A in the eventuality of the requirement of further action.

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)

Share Now

Share Now