New Delhi [India], April 6 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has set aside the Lokpal's direction ordering a CBI investigation against a senior DRI officer, holding that the decision was passed without any supporting material or proper reasoning.

The Court made it clear that merely having the power to order an investigation does not allow authorities to act arbitrarily or without evidence.

Also Read | Strait of Hormuz Update: Green Sanvi and Green Asha LPG Vessels Cross Safely As 16 Indian-Flagged Vessels With 433 Seafarers Remain in Persian Gulf.

In its judgement dated April 6, 2026, a Division Bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Renu Bhatnagar ruled that the Lokpal failed to show any valid basis for proceeding against the petitioner. The Court quashed the Lokpal's order of July 24, 2025, insofar as it related to him.

The case arose from a complaint alleging corruption and misuse of office against the petitioner and some customs officials. However, during the preliminary inquiry, the CBI found no evidence against the petitioner and effectively cleared him. This finding was also supported by the Directorate General of Vigilance and approved by the Finance Minister.

Also Read | Varanasi Boat Party Viral Videos: Men Seen Drinking, Dancing to DJ Songs on Boats on River Ganga; Probe Launched.

Despite this, the Lokpal issued a show-cause notice and later ordered a full investigation against the petitioner as well. The High Court found this action problematic, noting that neither the show-cause notice nor the final order contained any discussion or material specifically pointing to wrongdoing by the petitioner.

The Court stressed that under the law, the Lokpal must clearly explain why it disagrees with findings of a preliminary inquiry, especially when those findings favour the accused officer. In this case, no such reasons were given. The Court observed that relying only on allegations, particularly those made after a delay of several years, cannot justify initiating a criminal investigation.

It further held that issuing notices or directing probes without examining the individual role of a person undermines the legal process and violates basic principles of fairness. Any decision affecting rights must be backed by clear and specific reasons, not vague statements or general allegations.

Highlighting settled legal principles, the Court reiterated that quasi-judicial authorities like the Lokpal are required to record proper reasons in their orders. This ensures transparency, accountability and prevents arbitrary use of power.

Concluding that the Lokpal's order showed no proper application of mind and lacked any concrete material, the High Court allowed the petition and quashed the investigation order against the petitioner. However, it clarified that its decision applies only to the petitioner and not to the other officials involved in the case. (ANI)

(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)