Supreme Court to Examine Validity of Anti-Conversion Laws Enacted in Various States

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stated that it will consider a batch of pleas filed seeking a stay on anti-conversion laws that have been enacted and enforced in various states. A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran sought the response of various State governments to pleas challenging anti-conversion laws within a period of four weeks.

Supreme Court of India (Photo/ANI)

New Delhi, September 16: The Supreme Court on Tuesday stated that it will consider a batch of pleas filed seeking a stay on anti-conversion laws that have been enacted and enforced in various states. A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran sought the response of various State governments to pleas challenging anti-conversion laws within a period of four weeks. The Court has listed the matter to be heard next in six weeks. Supreme Court Accepts SIT Report Giving Clean Chit to Vantara Wildlife Facility.

During the hearing, the counsel appearing for one of the various petitioners submitted that various States, especially Uttar Pradesh, have made their anti-conversion laws more and more stringent. Violation of the said anti-conversion law in UP comes with a minimum sentence of 20 years, the counsel argued. Further, it was contended that the said laws impose a reverse burden of proof and make bail virtually impossible, particularly in cases involving interfaith marriages. The 'twin conditions' for bail, which are found in stringent legislations such as the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, have been brought in on the said anti-conversion laws, the counsel asserted. Yusuf Pathan Declared an ‘Encroacher’: Gujarat High Court Orders Former Cricketer To Vacate Government Land Next to His Vadodara Bungalow, Says ‘Celebrities Are Not Above Law’.

After hearing the arguments, the Court opined that the matter needs to be dealt with in a considerable amount of time. Thus, it sought the response of various States that have enacted anti-conversion laws within a period of four weeks and listed the matter to be heard next in six weeks. The top court has appointed two nodal counsels for either side involved in the matter. Advocate Srishti Agnihotri has been appointed to represent the petitioners, and Advocate Ruchira Goyal has been appointed to represent the States. There are many petitions challenging the anti-conversion laws passed by the governments of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, and Himachal Pradesh.

(The above story is verified and authored by ANI staff, ANI is South Asia's leading multimedia news agency with over 100 bureaus in India, South Asia and across the globe. ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health, Fitness, Entertainment, & News. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)

Rating:4

TruLY Score 4 – Reliable | On a Trust Scale of 0-5 this article has scored 4 on LatestLY. The information comes from reputable news agencies like (ANI). While not an official source, it meets professional journalism standards and can be confidently shared with your friends and family, though some updates may follow.

Share Now

Share Now