New Delhi, Sep 13 (PTI) The Delhi High Court Monday granted an additional four weeks to Manjinder Singh Sirsa to file reply on Delhi minister and AAP leader Satyendra Jain's plea related to his criminal defamation case against the Shiromani Akali Dal leader.

Justice Mukta Gupta also granted time to the two other accused - editor and publisher of a media house - to state their stand on the plea and posted the matter for hearing on January 13.

Also Read | Uttar Pradesh Horror: Two Sisters Gang-Raped in Etawah While Returning From Women Police Station, 3 Arrested.

Lawyers appearing for Sirsa and other accused sought time from the court to file their response.

On August 5, the judge had issued notice on Jain's plea challenging a trial court order rejecting his application to cure the defects in a legal document pertaining to his defamation complaint and stayed further proceedings before the trial court.

Also Read | Tamil Nadu: Drunk Man Stabs Father to Death With Sharp Knife After Heated Argument in Chennai.

In his petition, Jain informed that he filed a defective certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which was not in consonance with the guidelines framed, and thus sought the trial court's permission to file a corrected certificate to authenticate the electronic document pertaining to the allegedly defamatory statement in question.

“Trial Court erroneously passed the impugned order dated March 25, 2021 on the finding that the same (the application) is an attempt on part of the Petitioner (Jain) to fill in the lacuna of the case which cannot be allowed under Section 311 of CrPC,” the petition said.

The counsel for Jain had submitted that any defect in a Section 65B certificate was curable in nature and no prejudice would be caused to Sirsa if the complainant is recalled to rectify it.

The plea, filed through advocates Gautam Dhamija and Vaibhav Yadav, contended that the deficiency in the certificate could not be termed as a 'lacuna' as the same was only an oversight committed during the trial.

The proceedings in the matter are presently at the stage of clarifications/orders/judgment, the petition said.

Jain had filed a criminal defamation complaint against Sirsa and two others for allegedly defaming him by levelling graft charges against him.

The AAP MLA said that Sirsa made libellous statements by levelling corruption allegations against him on the basis of "hearsay" without any proof or evidence supporting it.

A special court in July 2019 had issued notice on the complaint.

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)