New Delhi, Mar 4 (PTI) Following is the chronology of events that led to Supreme Court's landmark verdict holding that MPs and MLAs taking bribes to vote or make a speech in the House are not immune from criminal prosecution:

Also Read | Cash-for-Query Row: Delhi High Court Rejects Interim Injunction Against 'Defamatory' Posts on TMC Leader Mahua Moitra.

* April 17, 1998: A five-judge Constitution bench, by 3:2 majority, held in the the Narasimha Rao vs CBI case, also known as JMM bribery case, that lawmakers have immunity against criminal prosecution for any speech made and the vote cast inside the House under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution

Also Read | Supreme Court Orders AAP To Vacate Its Political Office on Delhi High Court's Land by June 15.

* February 17, 2014: Jharkhand HC refuses to quash criminal case against JMM leader Sita Soren for allegedly taking bribe in Rajya Sabha polls in 2012

* September 23, 2014: A two-judge SC bench places before a larger bench the plea of JMM leader Sita Soren

* March 7, 2019: A three-judge bench refers the issue related to immunity of lawmakers to a larger bench

*September 20, 2023: A five-judge bench refers the issue and reconsideration of the 1998 verdict to a bench of seven judges

*October 5, 2023: The seven-judge bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud reserves judgment

* March 4, 2024: Observing that bribery is not protected by parliamentary privileges, the seven-judge bench overturns five-judge bench's interpretation in the 1998 verdict in the JMM bribery case.

It holds that MPs and MLAs taking bribes to vote or make a speech in the House are not immune from criminal prosecution.

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)