The Hague, Jul 14 (AP) Qatar won a legal battle Tuesday in its efforts to end a long-running aviation boycott by Arab neighbours when the United Nations' highest court ruled in its favour in a procedural dispute linked to the boycott.

The International Court of Justice rejected an appeal by Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates of a June 2018 decision by the International Civil Aviation Organization to dismiss the countries' challenge to its jurisdiction to rule in the aviation dispute.

Also Read | Mike Pompeo Calls For 'Free and Fair' Hong Kong Elections After China Warns Opposition Parties Over Primaries: Live News Breaking and Coronavirus Updates on July 14, 2020.

The ruling clears the way for the ICAO to be able to rule in Qatar's case, filed in October 2017, claiming the boycott breached an international convention governing international aviation.

Qatar's Minister of Transport and Communications, Jassim Saif Ahmed Al-Sulaiti, welcomed the ruling.

Also Read | Bastille Day 2020: PM Narendra Modi Wishes Emmanuel Macron And French People on 231st National Day of France.

“We are confident that the ICAO will ultimately find these actions unlawful,” he said. "This is the latest in a series of rulings that expose the Blockading Countries' continued disregard for international law and due process.

Step by step their arguments are being dismantled, and Qatar's position vindicated.” Egypt, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates cut ties with Qatar in the summer of 2017 over its support for Islamist opposition groups that they view as terrorists.

They also launched an economic boycott, stopping Qatar Airways flights from using their airspace, closing off the small country's sole land border with Saudi Arabia and blocking its ships from using their ports. (AP)

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)