New Delhi, Feb 25 (PTI) A Delhi court on Tuesday granted anticipatory bail to AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, saying he prima-facie facilitated an accused in escaping from the "wrongful confinement of police" but it wasn't an obstruction in the "so-called official discharge of duty".
Special judge Jitendra Singh said one Shahwez Khan was already on anticipatory bail in the attempt-to-murder case in which police had gone to arrest him.
Also Read | Delhi Cabinet Minister Parvesh Verma Assumes Charge As PWD Minister; Vows To Clean Yamuna.
"No injury has been caused to any of the police official and taking into account the alleged role of applicant, I am of the opinion that anticipatory bail must not be denied, solely on the basis of criminal antecedents," the judge said.
The court observed Shahwez was "in real danger of being in continuous wrongful confinement" and, therefore, Khan was protected under Section 35 (right of private defence of body and of property) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
"Even if for the sake of argument, the allegations taken against Khan is taken to be true, the exercise of the right of private defence by the accused Shahwez Khan in escaping from the wrongful confinement and facilitation of the accused Shahwez Khan in exercise of this right by the applicant does not amount to obstruction in the so-called official discharge of duty by the police team," the court said.
Delhi Police registered an FIR against the Okhla MLA in connection with the incident on February 10 and alleged he led a mob while aiding a proclaimed offender, accused in an attempt-to-murder case, to escape from custody.
The alleged incident, police said, occurred when Delhi Police's Crime Branch attempted to arrest Shabaz.
The court, however, held Khan deserved anticipatory bail and released him on a bond of Rs 25,000 with one surety in the like amount.
Granting the reprieve, the judge directed Khan to join and cooperate in the investigation whenever summoned by the investigating officer (IO), not flee from justice, tamper with the evidence, or threaten or contact any prosecution witnesses.
He was further ordered not to leave the country without the court's permission and intimate immediately if he changed addresses.
The judge observed the offence alleged against Khan attracted less then seven years, and there was "no requirement of custodial interrogation" in the case.
In response to police argument that Khan was a "habitual offender, involved in 26 criminal cases", the judge said the IO's report revealed in 16 cases, Khan was either discharged or acquitted whereas five cases were under probe and trial was pending in the rest.
(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)













Quickly


