Recently, the Calcutta High Court quashed cases filed by a wife against her husband and in-laws. The woman had accused them of cruelty under Section 498A the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and under various sections of the SC/ST Act and Juvenile Justice Act. The high court bench of Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta said, "The opposite party no. 2 is an educated and earning woman, and the routine expectations of contributing towards household expenses, making online purchases during the Covid-19 lockdown, or being asked to feed the child by the mother-in-law, cannot, by any stretch, constitute “#cruelty” within the meaning of Section 498A IPC." Calcutta High Court Directs Company To Pay Gratuity Plus Interest to Former Employee Within 2 Months, Says ‘Looking for Another Job Even With Rival Company Is Basic Right of Employee’.
Calcutta High Court Quashes Cases Filed by Woman Against Her Husband and In-Laws
The Calcutta High Court has quashed cases filed by a wife against her husband and in-laws, accusing them of cruelty under Section #498A the Indian Penal Code, and under various sections of the SC/ST Act and Juvenile Justice Act.
Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta held: "The opposite party… pic.twitter.com/wfq7MjhqaC
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) September 4, 2025
Women and Child Helpline Numbers:
Childline India – 1098; Missing Child and Women – 1094; Women’s Helpline – 181; National Commission for Women Helpline – 112; National Commission for Women Helpline Against Violence – 7827170170; Police Women and Senior Citizen Helpline – 1091/1291.
Men's Helpline Numbers:
Milaap: 9990588768; All India Men Helpline: 9911666498; Men Welfare Trust: 8882498498.
(SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, fact checks and information from social media world, including Twitter (X), Instagram and Youtube. The above post contains publicly available embedded media, directly from the user's social media account and the views appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY.)













Quickly


