Prayagraj (UP), Mar 1 (PTI) Denying any protection to a married Muslim woman who is in a live-in relationship with a Hindu man, the Allahabad High Court has said a legally-wedded Muslim wife cannot go outside marriage and her live-in arrangement with another man would amount to fornication and an act forbidden by Allah according to Sharia law.

Dismissing a petition filed by the woman and her live-in partner seeking protection due to a "threat" to her life from her father and other relatives, a bench of Justice Renu Agarwal said her "criminal" act "cannot be supported and protected" by the court.

Also Read | Arunachal Pradesh Assembly Elections 2024: NPP to Field 30 Candidates in Vidhan Sabha Polls.

Observing that the petitioner has not acquired any decree of divorce from her husband and is engaged in a live-in relationship, the court said, "The first petitioner is living with the second petitioner in contravention of the provisions of Muslim Law (Shariat), wherein a legally-wedded wife cannot go outside marriage and this act of Muslim women is defined as 'Zina' (fornication) and 'Haram' (an act forbidden by Allah)."

The petitioners had claimed that the woman's father and relatives were interfering in their peaceful live-in relationship.

Also Read | Rameshwaram Cafe Blast in Bengaluru: Karnataka Deputy CM DK Shivakumar Says Suspect's Identity Traced, To Be Arrested Soon (Watch Video).

According to the facts of the case, the woman was married to Mohsin, who remarried two years ago and is now cohabiting with his second wife. Following this, the petitioner moved back to her matrimonial home, but facing abuse from her husband, opted to reside with a Hindu man in a live-in relationship.

During the course of the hearing, the state's counsel opposed the woman's plea by submitting that since she had not obtained any decree of divorce from her husband and started living with the second petitioner, which amounted to adultery, their relationship could not be protected by law.

The court, in its judgment dated February 23, observed that since the woman had not moved any application to the authority concerned for converting her religion in accordance with the law in this regard and also not obtained divorce from her husband, she was not entitled to any protection.

(The above story is verified and authored by Press Trust of India (PTI) staff. PTI, India’s premier news agency, employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover almost every district and small town in India.. The views appearing in the above post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY)