Was Abishek Porel Out or Not Out? Fans Divided Over Third Umpire’s Decision During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match

The Delhi Capitals wicketkeeper was beaten by the delivery from Will Jacks and Ryan Rickelton did not waste time in taking off the bails. Fans debated the third umpire's decision.

Close
Search

Was Abishek Porel Out or Not Out? Fans Divided Over Third Umpire’s Decision During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match

The Delhi Capitals wicketkeeper was beaten by the delivery from Will Jacks and Ryan Rickelton did not waste time in taking off the bails. Fans debated the third umpire's decision.

Was Abishek Porel Out or Not Out? Fans Divided Over Third Umpire’s Decision During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match
Screengrab from Abhishek Porel's dismissal (Photo credit: JioHotstar)
Socially Team Latestly|

Was Abishek Porel out or not out? Fans debated the third umpire's decision to adjudge the Delhi Capitals wicketkeeper as out during the MI vs DC IPL 2025 match on May 21. This happened in the fifth over of the run chase when Abishek Porel was drawn forward by a delivery from Will Jacks and he missed the ball with Ryan Rickelton taking out the stumps in a flash. The decision was then referred to the third umpire Chris Gaffaney, who looked at a number of replays from several angles before concluding that the left-hander's foot was in the air when the bails were taken off. However, some fans felt that the foot was grounded and questioned the decision. Suryakumar Yadav Equals Temba Bavuma's Record of Most Consecutive 25+ Scores in Men's T20s, Achieves Feat During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match.

'Clearly Not Out'

'Leg Was Inside Crease'

'Looked NOT OUT'

'Abishek Porel Was Robbed'

'Abishek Porel Out'

'Clearly Not Out'

'Disgraceful Decision'

(SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter (X), Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)

Was Abishek Porel Out or Not Out? Fans Divided Over Third Umpire’s Decision During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match

The Delhi Capitals wicketkeeper was beaten by the delivery from Will Jacks and Ryan Rickelton did not waste time in taking off the bails. Fans debated the third umpire's decision.

Was Abishek Porel Out or Not Out? Fans Divided Over Third Umpire’s Decision During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match
Screengrab from Abhishek Porel's dismissal (Photo credit: JioHotstar)
Socially Team Latestly|

Was Abishek Porel out or not out? Fans debated the third umpire's decision to adjudge the Delhi Capitals wicketkeeper as out during the MI vs DC IPL 2025 match on May 21. This happened in the fifth over of the run chase when Abishek Porel was drawn forward by a delivery from Will Jacks and he missed the ball with Ryan Rickelton taking out the stumps in a flash. The decision was then referred to the third umpire Chris Gaffaney, who looked at a number of replays from several angles before concluding that the left-hander's foot was in the air when the bails were taken off. However, some fans felt that the foot was grounded and questioned the decision. Suryakumar Yadav Equals Temba Bavuma's Record of Most Consecutive 25+ Scores in Men's T20s, Achieves Feat During MI vs DC IPL 2025 Match.

'Clearly Not Out'

'Leg Was Inside Crease'

'Looked NOT OUT'

'Abishek Porel Was Robbed'

'Abishek Porel Out'

'Clearly Not Out'

'Disgraceful Decision'

(SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter (X), Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)